Difference between revisions of "Benefits / Tax Cuts"

From Resistance Manual
Jump to: navigation, search
(Unemployment Benefits)
(Unemployment Benefits)
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
Unemployment benefits largely focus on providing for immediate financial needs for people who are currently out of work but are able and available to work, with the intention of looking for and securing employment while receiving unemployment. In addition to supplementing income, unemployment benefits can also include job training and readiness programs.
 
Unemployment benefits largely focus on providing for immediate financial needs for people who are currently out of work but are able and available to work, with the intention of looking for and securing employment while receiving unemployment. In addition to supplementing income, unemployment benefits can also include job training and readiness programs.
 +
 +
For more information about eligibility and applying for UI, please [https://www.benefits.gov/benefits/benefit-details/91 follow the link] for more information.
  
 
===Trump/GOP agenda===
 
===Trump/GOP agenda===
  
 
The White House fully intends to implement a law that would allow states to drug test any applicant for unemployment benefits.  The previous restriction only tested applicants who do jobs that require drug testing.[https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/03/14/us/politics/ap-us-congress-drug-testing.html]  However, in instances around the United States drug testing Unemployment Insurance applications has repeatedly shown to be a failure at best and a waste of resources at worst. In Tennessee, only one person in the 800 who applied tested positive.  In Florida, during the four months the state tested for drug use, only 2.6% of applicants tested positive, which is well under the state-wide illegal drug use rate of 8%.  The Florida law wasted taxpayer money and was eventually ruled unconstitutional.[http://time.com/3117361/welfare-recipients-drug-testing/]
 
The White House fully intends to implement a law that would allow states to drug test any applicant for unemployment benefits.  The previous restriction only tested applicants who do jobs that require drug testing.[https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/03/14/us/politics/ap-us-congress-drug-testing.html]  However, in instances around the United States drug testing Unemployment Insurance applications has repeatedly shown to be a failure at best and a waste of resources at worst. In Tennessee, only one person in the 800 who applied tested positive.  In Florida, during the four months the state tested for drug use, only 2.6% of applicants tested positive, which is well under the state-wide illegal drug use rate of 8%.  The Florida law wasted taxpayer money and was eventually ruled unconstitutional.[http://time.com/3117361/welfare-recipients-drug-testing/]
 
For more information about eligibility and applying for UI, please [https://www.benefits.gov/benefits/benefit-details/91 follow the link] for more information.
 
  
 
==Trump's Tax Reform Plan==
 
==Trump's Tax Reform Plan==

Revision as of 15:18, 25 March 2017

This is a collaborative knowledge base; feel free to propose edits/additions that you believe are important for others to know. Contributions will be reviewed and approved based on quality and accuracy.

How You Can Resist

  • Call your Senator and US Representative by dialing tel:844-6-RESIST and tell them to vote against proposed actions that cut taxes for the highest earners.
  • Find out when your Senators and US Representative are holding town halls and other Upcoming Events/Opportunities. Show up and tell them not to cut taxes for the highest earners.
  • Click here to find an organization looking for volunteers.

Food Stamps (SNAP)

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program helps people buy healthy food. The majority of recipients are children or elderly with many working. In a 2012 report, 45 percent of SNAP recipients were under 18 years of age and nearly 9 percent were age 60 or older. More than 40 percent of recipients lived in a household with earnings.[1] SNAP has been essential in preventing families from falling into poverty. In 2011, SNAP was shown to lift 4.7 million households out of poverty. Without the program, the child poverty rate would be almost 3 percentage points higher.[2] During economic downturns SNAP can respond to meet the increased need. As the first recession was hitting its stride, SNAP was able to efficiently expand and serve families hit the hardest by the recession after effects like job losses and foreclosures. And then as the economy improves, the program contracts accordingly. Poverty increased during the recession, but food insecurity remained flat due in large part to SNAP's role in helping keep food on the table for families that needed it most.[3] SNAP benefits the economy, and USDA research shows that for every $5 in new SNAP benefits, $9 of economic activity is generated. The food that families purchase with their benefits to meet their needs helps keep local businesses making money.[4]

The largest group that received SNAP benefits according to 2013 data was white. The breakdown according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, was 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.[5] Three quarters of the 22 million households that received SNAP benefits in 2014 included a child, an elderly person or someone with a disability.[6]

For more information about eligibility and applying for the program, please follow the link.

Trump/GOP agenda

  • Trump has shown that he will act against key protections for Americans like SNAP with comments that the program "shouldn't be needed often", and that "when half of food-stamp recipients have been on the dole for nearly a decade, something is clearly wrong, and some of if has to do with fraud."[7]
  • Cuts to SNAP would be immediately damaging. The House version of the Farm Bill would cause 2 million Americans to lose their benefits entirely, 210,000 children to lose access to free meals at school, and 850,000 households to see their benefits cut by an average of $90 per month.[8]

WIC

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) provides Federal grants to States for supplemental foods, health care referrals, and nutrition education for low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and non-breastfeeding postpartum women, and to infants and children up to age five who are found to be at nutritional risk.[9]

The program is voucher based, and has a list of foods that are high in nutrients such as protein, fiber, iron & calcium. WIC accepting locations often also accept SNAP, and are required to keep a certain number of foods that meet the WIC nutritional standards in stock. Participants will turn in a voucher that covers all or most of the cost on food items such as bread, eggs, milk, fruits & vegetables.

In addition to safeguarding the health and well being of low-income women, infants and children, WIC has provided opportunities for small businesses and corner stores to grow and sustain their businesses in food deserts, which are areas where fresh or healthy food options are rare, or altogether missing. Many of these small business owners are able to stay in business because they are able to provide local options for buying food, where few or no options are available.

For more information on program requirements and how to determine eligibility, please follow the link.

Trump/GOP agenda

  • The Trump administration's new budget plans to reduce the budget of WIC by $200 million.[10]

Unemployment Benefits

The Department of Labor's Unemployment Insurance (UI) programs provide unemployment benefits to eligible workers who become unemployed through no fault of their own, and meet certain other eligibility requirements, most of which will vary from state to state.[11]

Unemployment benefits largely focus on providing for immediate financial needs for people who are currently out of work but are able and available to work, with the intention of looking for and securing employment while receiving unemployment. In addition to supplementing income, unemployment benefits can also include job training and readiness programs.

For more information about eligibility and applying for UI, please follow the link for more information.

Trump/GOP agenda

The White House fully intends to implement a law that would allow states to drug test any applicant for unemployment benefits. The previous restriction only tested applicants who do jobs that require drug testing.[12] However, in instances around the United States drug testing Unemployment Insurance applications has repeatedly shown to be a failure at best and a waste of resources at worst. In Tennessee, only one person in the 800 who applied tested positive. In Florida, during the four months the state tested for drug use, only 2.6% of applicants tested positive, which is well under the state-wide illegal drug use rate of 8%. The Florida law wasted taxpayer money and was eventually ruled unconstitutional.[13]

Trump's Tax Reform Plan

Who Benefits

The people who will receive a tax cut under Trump's tax plan are disproportionately wealthy:[14]

  • Top .1% will receive a tax cut of $1.3 million
  • Top 1% will receive a tax cut of $214,000
  • Top 20% will receive a tax cut of $16,660

Who Is Harmed

  • People who will receive a tax increase under Trump's plan are disproportionately people of color and single-parent households:[15]
    • 51% of single parent households
    • 8% of married households filing jointly
    • 32% of black households
    • 24% of Hispanic or Latino households
    • 19% of white non-Hispanic households
  • Trump's tax plan would cut discretionary spending - where most programs for poor families come from - from 6.3 percent of the economy now to 5.3 percent in 2027 (the smallest level since 1962).[16]
  • Trump's plan to repeal the inheritance tax would make wealth inequality worse in America.[17]

Vulnerabilities in Their Strategy

  • On average, states with Republican leadership are more dependent on the federal government for funds than are Democratic states.[18]

Source